Re: bugfix: --echo-hidden is not supported by \sf statements
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: bugfix: --echo-hidden is not supported by \sf statements |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRAkCsYtO4tyZ-gY==ftJVRDQeEEHwFK-mihnvk2LuRQhw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: bugfix: --echo-hidden is not supported by \sf statements (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: bugfix: --echo-hidden is not supported by \sf statements
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2013/2/23 Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>: > Pavel, > > * Pavel Stehule (pavel.stehule@gmail.com) wrote: >> We cannot to remove minimal_error_message() because there >> are >>two<< SQL queries and if we do fault tolerant oid lookup, then >> still pg_get_functiondef can raise exception. > > Why is that? lookup_function_oid() only collects the oid to pass to > get_create_function_cmd(), why not just issue one query to the backend? > And use PSQLexec() to boot and get --echo-hidden, etc, for free? And > eliminate the one-off error handling for just this case? yes, we can do it. There is only one issue routines for parsing function signature in regproc and regprocedure should be updated - and I would to get some agreement than I start to do modify core. Regards Pavel > > Thanks, > > Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: