Re: bugfix: --echo-hidden is not supported by \sf statements
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: bugfix: --echo-hidden is not supported by \sf statements |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25150.1361616954@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: bugfix: --echo-hidden is not supported by \sf statements (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: bugfix: --echo-hidden is not supported by \sf statements
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes: > 2013/2/23 Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>: >> Why is that? lookup_function_oid() only collects the oid to pass to >> get_create_function_cmd(), why not just issue one query to the backend? >> And use PSQLexec() to boot and get --echo-hidden, etc, for free? And >> eliminate the one-off error handling for just this case? > yes, we can do it. There is only one issue > routines for parsing function signature in regproc and regprocedure > should be updated - and I would to get some agreement than I start to > do modify core. Uh ... you seem to be asking for a blank check to modify regprocedure, which is unlikely to be forthcoming. Why do you think these things need to be changed, and to what? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: