Re: lost replication slots after pg_upgrade
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: lost replication slots after pg_upgrade |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRALhOYQrg=3weP6ZU27qRYZ3ML06K4AceNg5nT1NK0F9Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: lost replication slots after pg_upgrade (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: lost replication slots after pg_upgrade
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
út 13. 10. 2020 v 18:33 odesílatel Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> napsal:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 06:20:41PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Hi
>
> One customer reports issue related to pg_upgrade.
>
> I found a thread https://www.postgresql-archive.org/
> Upgrade-and-re-synchronization-with-logical-replication-pglogical-and-PG-10-td6001990.html
>
> But I didn't find documentation of this limitation?
So, what is the question? Peter Eisentraut is right that WAL is not
preserved, so replication slots are not preserved. We do have
pg_upgrade instructions for upgrading binary replication, but I assume
people recreate the slots.
I cannot find related documentation.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: