Re: lost replication slots after pg_upgrade
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: lost replication slots after pg_upgrade |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20201013165744.GF24889@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: lost replication slots after pg_upgrade (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: lost replication slots after pg_upgrade
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 06:37:14PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > > út 13. 10. 2020 v 18:33 odesílatel Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> napsal: > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 06:20:41PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > Hi > > > > One customer reports issue related to pg_upgrade. > > > > I found a thread https://www.postgresql-archive.org/ > > > Upgrade-and-re-synchronization-with-logical-replication-pglogical-and-PG-10-td6001990.html > > > > But I didn't find documentation of this limitation? > > So, what is the question? Peter Eisentraut is right that WAL is not > preserved, so replication slots are not preserved. We do have > pg_upgrade instructions for upgrading binary replication, but I assume > people recreate the slots. > > > I cannot find related documentation. You mean related documentation of how to manage changing replication slots? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: