Re: BUG #11528: Max Index Keys
| От | Paul Dasari |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: BUG #11528: Max Index Keys |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAFgphJpHyz5KHayQj8g3JS+7Aa5kjhWeiZTgYFE-YVV+Gq-L1A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: BUG #11528: Max Index Keys (John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
Hi John, Thanks much for your response. Yes I am using the JDBC Jar file from supplied from http://jdbc.postgresql.org/download/postgresql-8.4-703.jdbc4.jar Could you please help me provide a link so that i can post my question to the required support group. Thanks Paul On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 3:10 PM, John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com> wrote: > On 9/30/2014 11:44 AM, pdasari@mdsol.com wrote: > >> We are using Amazon Redshift postgreSQL. no matter what jar file we use it >> gives the following error message. >> > > jar file? what is this jar file? Do you mean JDBC ? The > PostgreSQL JDBC driver is its own project, has its own mailling lists. > The bug report form you used is for the core database server, which has no > Java components. > > Upon browsing, found that the source code is reading the max_index_keys >> should be greater than 0. However the redshift database does not require >> indexing. I really appreciate your assistance if there is any specific jar >> to use to avoid using the max_index_keys function while executing the >> query >> >> Below is the error we encountered: >> >> Unable to determine a value for MaxIndexKeys due to missing system catalog >> data >> > > While PostgreSQL doesn't require indexes, its standard practice in > relational databases to always define a primary key for every table. > I'm not sure why JDBC would be enforcing this. > > > > -- > john r pierce 37N 122W > somewhere on the middle of the left coast > >
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: