Re: BUG #11528: Max Index Keys
От | John R Pierce |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #11528: Max Index Keys |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 542B003E.3090801@hogranch.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG #11528: Max Index Keys (pdasari@mdsol.com) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #11528: Max Index Keys
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On 9/30/2014 11:44 AM, pdasari@mdsol.com wrote: > We are using Amazon Redshift postgreSQL. no matter what jar file we use it > gives the following error message. jar file? what is this jar file? Do you mean JDBC ? The PostgreSQL JDBC driver is its own project, has its own mailling lists. The bug report form you used is for the core database server, which has no Java components. > Upon browsing, found that the source code is reading the max_index_keys > should be greater than 0. However the redshift database does not require > indexing. I really appreciate your assistance if there is any specific jar > to use to avoid using the max_index_keys function while executing the query > > Below is the error we encountered: > > Unable to determine a value for MaxIndexKeys due to missing system catalog > data While PostgreSQL doesn't require indexes, its standard practice in relational databases to always define a primary key for every table. I'm not sure why JDBC would be enforcing this. -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: