Re: Ignoring BRIN for HOT updates (was: -udpates seems broken)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Matthias van de Meent
Тема Re: Ignoring BRIN for HOT updates (was: -udpates seems broken)
Дата
Msg-id CAEze2Wi9NP0gWNctAGFqOHswLeVdjTvf7gVve0f1yGdHCAuE+g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Ignoring BRIN for HOT updates (was: -udpates seems broken)  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>)
Ответы Re: Ignoring BRIN for HOT updates (was: -udpates seems broken)  (Josef Šimánek <josef.simanek@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 at 11:11, Tomas Vondra
<tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
> On 3/14/23 15:41, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 at 14:49, Tomas Vondra
> > <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> ...
> >
> >> If you agree with these changes, I'll get it committed.
> >
> > Yes, thanks!
> >
>
> I've tweaked the patch per the last round of comments, cleaned up the
> commit message a bit (it still talked about unused bit in tuple header
> and so on), and pushed it.
>
> Thanks for fixing the issues that got the patch reverted last year!

Thanks for helping getting this in!


Kind regards,

Matthias van de Meent.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Data is copied twice when specifying both child and parent table in publication
Следующее
От: Ashutosh Bapat
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: server log inflates due to pg_logical_slot_peek_changes/pg_logical_slot_get_changes calls