Re: DOCS: add helpful partitioning links
От | Ashutosh Bapat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: DOCS: add helpful partitioning links |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAExHW5uTxBRsQxZcoeJnmDEAhE213kCNO=ghRtPHBb1XsHxhvg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: DOCS: add helpful partitioning links (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: DOCS: add helpful partitioning links
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 11:22 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
On 2024-Mar-28, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> LGTM.
>
> The commitfest entry is marked as RFC already.
>
> Thanks for taking care of the comments.
Thanks for reviewing. I noticed a typo "seperate", fixed here.
Thanks for catching it.
Also, I
noticed that Robert added an empty line which looks in the source like
he's breaking the paragraph -- but because he didn't add a closing </para>
and an opening <para> to the next one, there's no actual new paragraph
in the HTML output.
My first instinct was to add those. However, upon reading the text, I
noticed that the previous paragraph ends without offering an example,
and then we attach the example to the paragraph that takes about CREATE
TABLE LIKE showing both techniques, which seemed a bit odd. So instead
I joined both paragraphs back together. I'm unsure which one looks
better. Which one do you vote for?
"CREATE TABLE ... LIKE" is mentioned in a separate paragraph in HEAD as well. The confused me too but I didn't find any reason. Robert just made that explicit by adding a blank line. I thought that was ok. But it makes sense to not have a separate paragraph in the source code too. Thanks for fixing it. I think the intention of the current code as well as the patch is to have a single paragraph in HTML output, same as "no-extra-para" output.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: