Re: DOCS: add helpful partitioning links
От | Ashutosh Bapat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: DOCS: add helpful partitioning links |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAExHW5u8tzDvL1S91-OPjVmF0uGpECHuAhsqJ-sH-5733VPgtw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: DOCS: add helpful partitioning links (Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: DOCS: add helpful partitioning links
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 10:58 PM Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net> wrote:
v5 patch attached which I think further improves clarity/brevity of
this section. I've left the patch name the same for simplicity, but
I'd agree that the commit would now be more along the lines of editing
/ improvements / copyrighting of "Partition Maintenance" docs.
Right. Minor suggestions.
- It is recommended to drop the now-redundant <literal>CHECK</literal>
- constraint after the <command>ATTACH PARTITION</command> is complete. If
- the table being attached is itself a partitioned table, then each of its
+ As illustrated above, it is recommended to avoid this scan by creating a
+ <literal>CHECK</literal> constraint on the to be attached table that
Instead of "to be attached table", "table to be attached" reads better. You may want to add "as a partition" after that.
Similarly, if the partitioned table has a <literal>DEFAULT</literal>
partition, it is recommended to create a <literal>CHECK</literal>
constraint which excludes the to-be-attached partition's constraint. If
- this is not done then the <literal>DEFAULT</literal> partition will be
+ this is not done, the <literal>DEFAULT</literal> partition must be
I am not sure whether replacing "will" by "must" is correct. Usually I have seen "will" being used in such sentences, "must" seems appropriate given the necessity.
- constraint after the <command>ATTACH PARTITION</command> is complete. If
- the table being attached is itself a partitioned table, then each of its
+ As illustrated above, it is recommended to avoid this scan by creating a
+ <literal>CHECK</literal> constraint on the to be attached table that
Instead of "to be attached table", "table to be attached" reads better. You may want to add "as a partition" after that.
Similarly, if the partitioned table has a <literal>DEFAULT</literal>
partition, it is recommended to create a <literal>CHECK</literal>
constraint which excludes the to-be-attached partition's constraint. If
- this is not done then the <literal>DEFAULT</literal> partition will be
+ this is not done, the <literal>DEFAULT</literal> partition must be
I am not sure whether replacing "will" by "must" is correct. Usually I have seen "will" being used in such sentences, "must" seems appropriate given the necessity.
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: