Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes
От | Ranier Vilela |
---|---|
Тема | Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEudQApTqCP2+Kso7=V49hNysmbMhnWCVEXPtvE-dDUssH6-uQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes (Alena Rybakina <lena.ribackina@yandex.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Em ter., 11 de jul. de 2023 às 09:29, Alena Rybakina <lena.ribackina@yandex.ru> escreveu:
Hi!
On 10.07.2023 15:15, Ranier Vilela wrote:Sorry, I fixed it.Em seg., 10 de jul. de 2023 às 09:03, Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com> escreveu:Hi Alena,Em seg., 10 de jul. de 2023 às 05:38, Alena Rybakina <lena.ribackina@yandex.ru> escreveu:I agreed with the changes. Thank you for your work.
I updated patch and added you to the authors.
I specified Ranier Vilela as a reviewer.Is a good habit when post a new version of the patch, name it v1, v2, v3,etc.Makes it easy to follow development and references on the thread.Agreed.Regarding the last patch.1. I think that variable const_is_left is not necessary.You can stick with:+ if (IsA(get_leftop(orqual), Const))
+ nconst_expr =get_rightop(orqual);+ const_expr = get_leftop(orqual) ;+ else if (IsA(get_rightop(orqual), Const))+ nconst_expr =get_leftop(orqual);+ const_expr = get_rightop(orqual) ;+ else
+ {
+ or_list = lappend(or_list, orqual);
+ continue;
+ }
You missed in removing the declaration
- bool const_is_left = true;
.
.
Is it safe? Maybe we should first make sure that it can be checked on RECORDOID at all?2. Test scalar_type != RECORDOID is more cheaper,mainly if OidIsValid were a function, we knows that is a macro.+ if (scalar_type != RECORDOID && OidIsValid(scalar_type))
Yes it's safe, because && connector.
But you can leave as is in v5.
best regards,
Ranier Vilela
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: