Re: psql tab completion for updatable foreign tables
От | Dean Rasheed |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql tab completion for updatable foreign tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEZATCX2n+SDX_h9Bo3CrP+CpxYdTEdgLfoTkK=DnVPJOyoz0A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: psql tab completion for updatable foreign tables (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: psql tab completion for updatable foreign tables
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 17 October 2013 03:29, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 16:04 +0000, Dean Rasheed wrote: >> There was concern that pg_relation_is_updatable() would end up opening >> every relation in the database, hammering performance. I now realise >> that these tab-complete queries have a limit (1000 by default) so I >> don't think this is such an issue. I tested it by creating 10,000 >> randomly named auto-updatable views on top of a table, and didn't see >> any performance problems. > > Even if performance isn't a problem, do we really want tab completion > interfering with table locking? That might be a step too far. > That's a good point. Currently it's calling pg_table_is_visible(), which is doing similar work opening each relation, but it isn't locking any of them. > Personally, I think this is too fancy anyway. I'd just complete all > views and foreign tables and be done with it. We don't inspect > permissions either, for example. This might be too confusing for users. > Yeah, I think you're probably right. Regards, Dean
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: