Re: Alias hstore's ? to ~ so that it works with JDBC
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Alias hstore's ? to ~ so that it works with JDBC |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CADK3HHLY2bzumJvVx6dxKNVqdrT-ExX2bNjNsnFLuTXyR-yPeQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Alias hstore's ? to ~ so that it works with JDBC (Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Alias hstore's ? to ~ so that it works with JDBC
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com> wrote:
Dave Cramer
dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
I think changing JDBC is the way to go. Currently JDBC supports escape
On Wed, 6 Feb 2013, Seamus Abshere wrote:
> I personally don't know of any way around the conflict except changing
> JDBC or hstore, and I don't think JDBC is gonna change.
>
sequences for cross database portability and it seems reasonable to
support an escape sequence that allowed passing ? to the backend instead
of interpreting it as a parameter. This will be more complicated than you
might hope because the escape processing currently happens prior to bind
parameter detection so I'm not sure what a good patch would really look
like, but given the feedback provided here, it's worth investigating.
Kris Jurka
Would this be an postgresql specific escape sequence ? I don't think the spec allows for this does it ?
dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: