Re: postgresql-jdbc driver not respecting prepareThreshold=0
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgresql-jdbc driver not respecting prepareThreshold=0 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CADK3HHKKApfgiJr6T3EDom8N=L_u_eAfWsFi8tjcU3H++QfiEw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [JDBC] postgresql-jdbc driver not respecting prepareThreshold=0 (Jorge Solórzano <jorsol@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: postgresql-jdbc driver not respecting prepareThreshold=0
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On 3 February 2017 at 08:53, Jorge Solórzano <jorsol@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 6:30 AM, Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> wrote:On 3 February 2017 at 07:16, Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com> wrote:TL;DR: I suggest to review "feat: use java.util.logging", test it, merge it and release the resulting artifact as pgjdbc 42.0.0Are there any concerns regarding that plan?I haven't had a good look at it. Does the old way of enabling it work ? Does anyone care ?Hi Dave, the old way of enabling it do not work. Maybe we can start a new thread asking if anyone care, I really hope that nobody cares, since it have the potential of break compatibility if someone is using the old way for something more than debug localy.
Sorry for not looking this up myself, but have you provided an updated documentation patch then ?
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: