Re: Fwd: Postgres JDBC, WS and commit
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Fwd: Postgres JDBC, WS and commit |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CADK3HHKE=4xBa2Ghz2qRB2DSjKtBJRJ_RoR5Ud+=ayDTiL_Tow@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Fwd: Postgres JDBC, WS and commit (mephysto <mephystoonhell@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Fwd: Postgres JDBC, WS and commit
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Even in a pool if you issue a commit then the data should be committed. Is the connection open in transaction mode ? Are you executing a commit ? Dave Cramer dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca http://www.credativ.ca On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:11 PM, mephysto <mephystoonhell@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Kevin, > I will try to explain my scenario: with my application, many users exchange > message within them. User1 send message to user2 by a web service. This web > service send message and wait the response from user 2 before end and send > notice to user1. I can't know how many time is needed for response, so, I > would to save te state in a table on database to prevent accidental > disconnection of client from web service. > > But I found that, if transaction are not closed until web service operation > end, my table are not update, and I can't know the wait state of user1 and I > can't take back he to his request. > Moreover, if transaction lock my table, and other user, user3, send a > message to user4, I can't save his state until user1 operation end. > > Is it clear enough? > > Is there any wrong in my reasoning? Is there anything I ignore in pool > functionality? > > Thanks in advance. > > Mephysto > > -- > View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Postgres-JDBC-WS-and-commit-tp5697657p5698263.html > Sent from the PostgreSQL - jdbc mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- > Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: