Re: Fwd: Postgres JDBC, WS and commit
От | mephysto |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Fwd: Postgres JDBC, WS and commit |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1336590679429-5698263.post@n5.nabble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Fwd: Postgres JDBC, WS and commit (Kevin Carr <kscarr73@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Fwd: Postgres JDBC, WS and commit
Re: Fwd: Postgres JDBC, WS and commit |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Hi Kevin, I will try to explain my scenario: with my application, many users exchange message within them. User1 send message to user2 by a web service. This web service send message and wait the response from user 2 before end and send notice to user1. I can't know how many time is needed for response, so, I would to save te state in a table on database to prevent accidental disconnection of client from web service. But I found that, if transaction are not closed until web service operation end, my table are not update, and I can't know the wait state of user1 and I can't take back he to his request. Moreover, if transaction lock my table, and other user, user3, send a message to user4, I can't save his state until user1 operation end. Is it clear enough? Is there any wrong in my reasoning? Is there anything I ignore in pool functionality? Thanks in advance. Mephysto -- View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Postgres-JDBC-WS-and-commit-tp5697657p5698263.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - jdbc mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: