Re: setPortNumber() should not be used when useing connectionfail-over feature with PGConnectionPoolDataSource?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dave Cramer
Тема Re: setPortNumber() should not be used when useing connectionfail-over feature with PGConnectionPoolDataSource?
Дата
Msg-id CADK3HH+n+1W-1F8wcnqf=_Etx-E5J0ZEOyFZxmOfEL5sAe7cMA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на RE: setPortNumber() should not be used when useing connectionfail-over feature with PGConnectionPoolDataSource?  ("Okano, Naoki" <okano.naoki@jp.fujitsu.com>)
Список pgsql-jdbc
Дерево обсуждения
To be honest, we've not put a lot of work into pooling implementations as there are far better ones out there.

That being said, there aren't good ones that do automatic failover so perhaps there is some utility in it



On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 at 03:09, Okano, Naoki <okano.naoki@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
Dave Cramer [mailto:pg@fastcrypt.com] wrote:
> Pretty sure this was never intended to work.
>
>
> That said if you can provide a pull request we can look at implementing it.

Thank you for your reply!
I understand it does not work as intended.
So, I try to implement it and will send a pull request.

Regards,
Okano Naoki

В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Okano, Naoki"
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: setPortNumber() should not be used when useing connectionfail-over feature with PGConnectionPoolDataSource?
Следующее
От: Rob Sargent
Дата:
Сообщение: PGCopyOutputStream close() v. endCopy()