Re: Release for 9.5
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Release for 9.5 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CADK3HH+cwxG8s9fZMtMrzznm4nzMK_oGVKCM7=3jeKWH1F3jYQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Release for 9.5 (Stephen Nelson <stephen@eccostudio.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Release for 9.5
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On 12 November 2015 at 17:35, Stephen Nelson <stephen@eccostudio.com> wrote:
Does the version number need to be in the artifact name or just the version in the pom?
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Vladimir Sitnikov
<sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'd like to not use postgresql's version number in our artifacts.
>
I agree. The only issue is the numbering is used on some Maven
repository sites to indicate new versions. If we go to a version
number less than the current one, it might not be recognised.
It might be a good opportunity to adopt http://semver.org/ too?
fine with me.
--
Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: