Re: C trigger significantly slower than PL/pgSQL?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dave Cramer
Тема Re: C trigger significantly slower than PL/pgSQL?
Дата
Msg-id CADK3HH+_Vi4uoRaQmDSNPoZfAvm8A_NLQ87=EaXv1DxxXYrmsQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: C trigger significantly slower than PL/pgSQL?  (pgchem pgchem <pgchem@tuschehund.de>)
Ответы Re: C trigger significantly slower than PL/pgSQL?
Список pgsql-interfaces


On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 at 07:33, pgchem pgchem <pgchem@tuschehund.de> wrote:
Hello Dave,
 
> It would be infinitely easier to answer this question if you posted both functions and the plans 
 
before posting lengthy code to the list, I just wanted to verify beforehand that this is not a well known issue.
Fair. So to answer your question. The C function should be faster.


Dave Cramer
www.postgres.rocks

В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: pgchem pgchem
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: C trigger significantly slower than PL/pgSQL?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: C trigger significantly slower than PL/pgSQL?