Re: [PATCH] Add PQconninfoParseParams and PQconninfodefaultsMerge to libpq
От | Phil Sorber |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Add PQconninfoParseParams and PQconninfodefaultsMerge to libpq |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CADAkt-hMTTL6Q6Mu1_YGT5nLbBPeKrdKWo-pHU5aEXzZs7BEQQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Add PQconninfoParseParams and PQconninfodefaultsMerge to libpq (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote: > On 04.02.2013 17:32, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> >> Phil Sorber wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Alvaro Herrera >>> <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Phil Sorber wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Alvaro >>>>> Herrera<alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>> Uh, no existing code can use this new functionality? That seems >>>>>> disappointing. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I wrote this because I wanted to use it in pg_isready. I also wrote >>>>> something for pg_isready to get around not having this. I think adding >>>>> these two functions to libpq would be the better option, but wanted >>>>> something that could fix an existing issue without having to patch >>>>> libpq so late in the 9.3 development process. Actually, I think it was >>>>> you who suggested that approach. >>>> >>>> >>>> Yes, I realize that (and yes, I did). But is no code other than >>>> pg_isready doing this? Not even the libpq URI test program? >>> >>> >>> I think it probably would be able to benefit from this. Are you >>> suggesting I patch that too? I thought it was usually frowned upon to >>> touch random bits of working code like that. I'd be more than happy to >>> do it if it helps build the case for getting this added. >> >> >> Well, this qualifies as refactoring, so yeah, it helps the case. > > > I think this patch would simplift the patch to pass a connection string to > pg_basebackup and pg_receivexlog: > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/005501cdfa45$6b0eec80$412cc580$@kommi@huawei.com. > I note that pg_dumpall also has a similar issue as pg_basebackup and > pg_receivexlog; there's no way to pass a connection string to it either. > > If you could come up with a unified patch that takes care of all of those, > that would be great. I will take a look. > > - Heikki
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: