Re: [PATCH] Add PQconninfoParseParams and PQconninfodefaultsMerge to libpq
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Add PQconninfoParseParams and PQconninfodefaultsMerge to libpq |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5119607E.7060903@vmware.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Add PQconninfoParseParams and PQconninfodefaultsMerge to libpq (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Add PQconninfoParseParams and
PQconninfodefaultsMerge to libpq
Re: [PATCH] Add PQconninfoParseParams and PQconninfodefaultsMerge to libpq |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 04.02.2013 17:32, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Phil Sorber wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Alvaro Herrera >> <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>> Phil Sorber wrote: >>>> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Alvaro Herrera<alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>> >>>>> Uh, no existing code can use this new functionality? That seems >>>>> disappointing. >>>> >>>> I wrote this because I wanted to use it in pg_isready. I also wrote >>>> something for pg_isready to get around not having this. I think adding >>>> these two functions to libpq would be the better option, but wanted >>>> something that could fix an existing issue without having to patch >>>> libpq so late in the 9.3 development process. Actually, I think it was >>>> you who suggested that approach. >>> >>> Yes, I realize that (and yes, I did). But is no code other than >>> pg_isready doing this? Not even the libpq URI test program? >> >> I think it probably would be able to benefit from this. Are you >> suggesting I patch that too? I thought it was usually frowned upon to >> touch random bits of working code like that. I'd be more than happy to >> do it if it helps build the case for getting this added. > > Well, this qualifies as refactoring, so yeah, it helps the case. I think this patch would simplift the patch to pass a connection string to pg_basebackup and pg_receivexlog: http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/005501cdfa45$6b0eec80$412cc580$@kommi@huawei.com. I note that pg_dumpall also has a similar issue as pg_basebackup and pg_receivexlog; there's no way to pass a connection string to it either. If you could come up with a unified patch that takes care of all of those, that would be great. - Heikki
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: