Re: Add isCatalogRel in rmgrdesc
От | Masahiko Sawada |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Add isCatalogRel in rmgrdesc |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAD21AoDQ80Himyhpwu14FUE4UezCq7biOCGAY6DcVBjd4b34sA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Add isCatalogRel in rmgrdesc (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:13 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 9:04 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 10:43:30AM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote: > > > Thank you for updating the patch. The v2 patch looks good to me. I'll > > > push it, barring any objections. > > > > This is capturing the eight records where the flag exists, so it looks > > OK seen from here. > > > > As you said, there may be a point in reducing the output in the most > > common case and not show the flag when !isCatalogRel, but I cannot get > > excited about that either because that would require one to do more > > cross-checks with the core code when looking at WAL dumps. > > Thank you for the comments. Agreed. > > I've just pushed, bf6260b39. > FYI, in the commitfest app, there seems to be two duplicated entries for this item: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/46/4694/ https://commitfest.postgresql.org/46/4695/ I've marked the latter one as committed, and will remove the former. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: