Re: Add isCatalogRel in rmgrdesc
От | Masahiko Sawada |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Add isCatalogRel in rmgrdesc |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAD21AoBQh0Nawbi-=26Zq1OydEat9bNU3VAs1vXQ_UjSPCZ1EQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Add isCatalogRel in rmgrdesc (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Add isCatalogRel in rmgrdesc
Re: Add isCatalogRel in rmgrdesc |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 9:04 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 10:43:30AM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote: > > Thank you for updating the patch. The v2 patch looks good to me. I'll > > push it, barring any objections. > > This is capturing the eight records where the flag exists, so it looks > OK seen from here. > > As you said, there may be a point in reducing the output in the most > common case and not show the flag when !isCatalogRel, but I cannot get > excited about that either because that would require one to do more > cross-checks with the core code when looking at WAL dumps. Thank you for the comments. Agreed. I've just pushed, bf6260b39. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: