Re: [HACKERS] Fix GetOldestXmin comment
От | Masahiko Sawada |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Fix GetOldestXmin comment |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAD21AoDM9FQ7n_b9HTSjFMhJKhsWdS2sp61T1nov7CnqEZZfSw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Fix GetOldestXmin comment (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 11:07 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 6:32 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> While reading source code, I realized that comment of GetOldestXmin mentions; >> >> * if rel = NULL and there are no transactions running in the current >> * database, GetOldestXmin() returns latestCompletedXid. >> >> However, in that case if I understand correctly GetOldestXmin() >> actually returns latestCompletedXid + 1 as follows; >> > > Isn't there another gotcha in above part of the comment, shouldn't it > say rel != NULL? AFAICS, when rel is NULL, it considers all databases > not only current database. > Hmm it could return latestCompletedXid in that case. I think I understood now, Thank you! Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: