Re: [HACKERS] Fix GetOldestXmin comment
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Fix GetOldestXmin comment |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1L08j7Pd1T4AFHZm6t5Yq8Ciy93YXhn9vaBGJJoJJZ2_w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [HACKERS] Fix GetOldestXmin comment (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Fix GetOldestXmin comment
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 6:32 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > While reading source code, I realized that comment of GetOldestXmin mentions; > > * if rel = NULL and there are no transactions running in the current > * database, GetOldestXmin() returns latestCompletedXid. > > However, in that case if I understand correctly GetOldestXmin() > actually returns latestCompletedXid + 1 as follows; > Isn't there another gotcha in above part of the comment, shouldn't it say rel != NULL? AFAICS, when rel is NULL, it considers all databases not only current database. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: