Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.
От | Masahiko Sawada |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAD21AoCoxnD+=kZAJ68H9RMEsVNZqc9BCo92oFq3F=61J+i-sA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: >> I was thinking that the syntax for quorum method would use '[ ... ]' >> but it will be confused with '( ... )' priority method used. >> 001 patch adds 'Any N ( ... )' style syntax but I know that we still >> might need to discuss about better syntax, discussion is very welcome. >> Attached draft patch, please give me feedback. > > I am +1 for using either "{}" or "[]" to define a quorum set, and -1 > for the addition of a keyword in front of the integer defining for how > many nodes server need to wait for. Thank you for reply. "{}" or "[]" are not bad but because these are not intuitive, I thought that it will be hard for uses to use different method for each purpose. > - foreach(cell, sync_standbys) > + foreach (cell, sync_standbys) > { > - WalSnd *walsnd = &WalSndCtl->walsnds[lfirst_int(cell)]; > + WalSnd *walsnd = &WalSndCtl->walsnds[lfirst_int(cell)]; > This patch has some noise. Will fix. -- Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: