Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqTrXrfrhNVJYcyB2r-6ZVnAzsHbf9_6ZCfi+EnkHeTYwg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > I was thinking that the syntax for quorum method would use '[ ... ]' > but it will be confused with '( ... )' priority method used. > 001 patch adds 'Any N ( ... )' style syntax but I know that we still > might need to discuss about better syntax, discussion is very welcome. > Attached draft patch, please give me feedback. I am +1 for using either "{}" or "[]" to define a quorum set, and -1 for the addition of a keyword in front of the integer defining for how many nodes server need to wait for. - foreach(cell, sync_standbys) + foreach (cell, sync_standbys) { - WalSnd *walsnd = &WalSndCtl->walsnds[lfirst_int(cell)]; + WalSnd *walsnd = &WalSndCtl->walsnds[lfirst_int(cell)]; This patch has some noise. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: