Re: Proposal : REINDEX xxx VERBOSE
От | Sawada Masahiko |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal : REINDEX xxx VERBOSE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAD21AoCP-u1Yfpo7QwnBtgjSzOOzhr-sDS_7zPJhA21OrOWfdA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal : REINDEX xxx VERBOSE (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposal : REINDEX xxx VERBOSE
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 4:53 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Alvaro Herrera > <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> Uh, are we really using INFO to log this? I thought that was a >> discouraged level to use anymore. Why not NOTICE? > > Well, as Masahiko-san points out, VACUUM uses INFO. I can't see any > good reason to make this different. > >> Also, when multiple tables are reindexed, do we emit lines for each >> index, or only for each table? If we're going to emit a line for each >> index in the single-table mode, it seems more sensible to do the same >> for the multi-table forms also. > > Hmm, yeah, I agree with that. I thought the patch worked that way, > but I see now that it doesn't. I think that should be changed. > The v15 patch emits a line for each table when reindexing multiple tables, and emits a line for each index when reindexing single table. But v14 patch emits a line for each index, regardless of reindex target. Should I change back to v14 patch? Regards, ------- Sawada Masahiko
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: