Re: Proposal : REINDEX xxx VERBOSE
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal : REINDEX xxx VERBOSE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoaKmEDGyG=vt3EF8Hex3inWhsjB_PtTsP9QuNyCKJsrkA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal : REINDEX xxx VERBOSE (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposal : REINDEX xxx VERBOSE
Re: Proposal : REINDEX xxx VERBOSE |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Uh, are we really using INFO to log this? I thought that was a > discouraged level to use anymore. Why not NOTICE? Well, as Masahiko-san points out, VACUUM uses INFO. I can't see any good reason to make this different. > Also, when multiple tables are reindexed, do we emit lines for each > index, or only for each table? If we're going to emit a line for each > index in the single-table mode, it seems more sensible to do the same > for the multi-table forms also. Hmm, yeah, I agree with that. I thought the patch worked that way, but I see now that it doesn't. I think that should be changed. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: