Re: Is Recovery actually paused?
От | Masahiko Sawada |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is Recovery actually paused? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAD21AoA85qwRsq8jPt=e6t2hMJWhJKehHuHmqizV4rDrsD7EEg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Is Recovery actually paused? (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Is Recovery actually paused?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 2:00 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 6:10 AM Bharath Rupireddy > <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 to just show the recovery pause state in the output of > > pg_is_wal_replay_paused. But, should the function name > > "pg_is_wal_replay_paused" be something like > > "pg_get_wal_replay_pause_state" or some other? To me, when "is" exists > > in a function, I expect a boolean output. Others may have better > > thoughts. > > Maybe we should leave the existing function pg_is_wal_replay_paused() > alone and add a new one with the name you suggest that returns text. > That would create less burden for tool authors. +1 Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: