Re: Is Recovery actually paused?
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is Recovery actually paused? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYG0RKrcyCt_kbmTRFd9r05rv=ZoD59S_c-AzFLt5_N5A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Is Recovery actually paused? (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Is Recovery actually paused?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 6:10 AM Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 to just show the recovery pause state in the output of > pg_is_wal_replay_paused. But, should the function name > "pg_is_wal_replay_paused" be something like > "pg_get_wal_replay_pause_state" or some other? To me, when "is" exists > in a function, I expect a boolean output. Others may have better > thoughts. Maybe we should leave the existing function pg_is_wal_replay_paused() alone and add a new one with the name you suggest that returns text. That would create less burden for tool authors. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: