Re: CF app feature request
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CF app feature request |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABUevEzFjC_rOMvaLDL9Ha4=5n94AqS1bEyxuDB5gJzRoGn-mA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CF app feature request (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 7:19 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> I'm trying to figure out where this thread left off :) My understanding of
> the consensus is we don't actually want/need a change in the app, but are
> instead OK with the admin just handling it a somewhat ugly way in the few
> cases where it's necessary?
The original case (just a mistakenly duplicated entry) seems OK to solve
with a quick DELETE on the underlying table.
> Or is the consensus to add a "Withdrawn" status, just to solve a slightly
> different problem from the one that started this thread?
I think there is a use-case for "Withdrawn", it's more polite than
"Rejected" ;-). But it's not a very high-priority request.
Status "Withdrawn" has now been added.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: