Re: CF app feature request
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CF app feature request |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 26198.1542737961@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CF app feature request (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: CF app feature request
Re: CF app feature request |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: > I'm trying to figure out where this thread left off :) My understanding of > the consensus is we don't actually want/need a change in the app, but are > instead OK with the admin just handling it a somewhat ugly way in the few > cases where it's necessary? The original case (just a mistakenly duplicated entry) seems OK to solve with a quick DELETE on the underlying table. > Or is the consensus to add a "Withdrawn" status, just to solve a slightly > different problem from the one that started this thread? I think there is a use-case for "Withdrawn", it's more polite than "Rejected" ;-). But it's not a very high-priority request. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: