Re: ftp.postgresql.org vs. ftp-archives.postgresql.org
| От | Magnus Hagander |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: ftp.postgresql.org vs. ftp-archives.postgresql.org |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CABUevEzBEnB255w-qoK24GFkv+YMreyohTqGOwtzDXp_0jtF_A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: ftp.postgresql.org vs. ftp-archives.postgresql.org (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: ftp.postgresql.org vs. ftp-archives.postgresql.org
|
| Список | pgsql-www |
On Friday, November 25, 2011, Dave Page wrote:
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
2011/11/25 Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org>:
> On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 09:55 +0000, Dave Page wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> So, should we merge the trees back together, and get rid of
>> ftp-archives.postgresql.org? I'm +1, fwiw.
>
> +1 from me, too. BTW, I'm assuming that we will keep ftp-archives
> address, so that the links in the archives, etc. won't be broken.
I hadn't considered that, but yes, we can of course.
I'm +1 as well. We *can* measure the load on the archives server, and it's very low (it seems to peak around 1Mbit/sec, and that's very rare).
But we should probably wait until after we know the load on the new ftp boxes - just to be on the safe side. Should be easy enough to do it as two steps, right?
//Magnus
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: