Re: ftp.postgresql.org vs. ftp-archives.postgresql.org

2011/11/25 Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>:
> On Friday, November 25, 2011, Dave Page wrote:
>>
>> 2011/11/25 Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org>:
>> > On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 09:55 +0000, Dave Page wrote:
>> >
>> > <snip>
>> >
>> >> So, should we merge the trees back together, and get rid of
>> >> ftp-archives.postgresql.org? I'm +1, fwiw.
>> >
>> > +1 from me, too. BTW, I'm assuming that we will keep ftp-archives
>> > address, so that the links in the archives, etc. won't be broken.
>>
>> I hadn't considered that, but yes, we can of course.
>>
> I'm +1 as well. We *can* measure the load on the archives server, and it's
> very low (it seems to peak around 1Mbit/sec, and that's very rare).

Yeah, I was referring to our current inability to get accurate ftp. numbers.

> But we should probably wait until after we know the load on the new ftp
> boxes - just to be on the safe side. Should be easy enough to do it as two
> steps, right?

Yeah, I wasn't planning on doing anything until sometime next week anyway.

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company