Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABUevEydhOM7p3Ja_Xgs2c2ob1hUPXc+9kPUwzNtodLu1Veq8g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 02:34, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > Simon Riggs wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: >> > On tor, 2011-06-30 at 15:09 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> >> Robert Hass (whose name I misspelled in the commit message above) just >> >> mentioned to me (in an answer to my apologizing about it) that he >> >> didn't think that mentioning sponsors for patch development was a good >> >> idea. >> >> >> >> I don't think we have a policy for this, but I have done it for some >> >> time now and nobody has complained, so I sort of assumed it was okay. >> >> Besides, some of the people pouring the money in does care about it; >> >> moreover, it provides a little incentive for other companies that >> >> might also be in a position to fund development but lack the "peer >> >> approval" of the idea, or a final little push. >> > >> > I think commit messages should be restricted to describing what was >> > changed and who is responsible for it. ?Once we open it for things like >> > sponsorship, what's to stop people from adding personal messages, what >> > they had for breakfast, "currently listening to", or just selling >> > advertising space in each commit message for 99 cents? >> >> Agreed. >> >> We should credit people somewhere, but not here. >> >> Otherwise, we'll be forced to add "Sponsored by RedHat", "Sponsored by >> 2ndQuadrant" etc onto commit messages. > > Agreed. On one level I like the sponsor message, but on the other > having "Sponsored by RedHat" on every Tom Lane item will get tiring. > ;-) > > Can we add text if the employer is _not_ the feature sponsor? That would be quite unfair to those who *do* employ committers.... Basically you'd get credit only if you didn't employ a committer. This all becomes much easier if we keep the ads out of the commit messages, and stick to the technical side there. And find another venue for the other credit. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: