Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1310478598-sup-9088@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to
be declared NOT VALID
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Magnus Hagander's message of mar jul 12 09:34:56 -0400 2011: > > Agreed. On one level I like the sponsor message, but on the other > > having "Sponsored by RedHat" on every Tom Lane item will get tiring. > > ;-) > > > > Can we add text if the employer is _not_ the feature sponsor? > > That would be quite unfair to those who *do* employ committers.... > Basically you'd get credit only if you didn't employ a committer. Well, that has worked well for my case -- I haven't ever credited my employer, only those that have specifically hired us for a particular patch. My employer gets a lot of "credit" in the form of email signatures, like the one below ;-) But I see your point and I will stick to whatever policy we come up with (assuming we come up with one). > This all becomes much easier if we keep the ads out of the commit > messages, and stick to the technical side there. And find another > venue for the other credit. I'm open to ideas. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: