Re: May be BUG. Periodic burst growth of the checkpoint_req counter on replica.
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: May be BUG. Periodic burst growth of the checkpoint_req counter on replica. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABUevExav5-SR0x+G9kBUMV0G8XsvSUfuyyqmYBBJi6VHns6sw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: May be BUG. Periodic burst growth of the checkpoint_req counter on replica. (Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: May be BUG. Periodic burst growth of the checkpoint_req counter on replica.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 11:04 PM Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, Anton! > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 3:50 AM Anton A. Melnikov <a.melnikov@postgrespro.ru> wrote: >> >> Thanks for remarks! >> >> On 28.11.2023 21:34, Alexander Korotkov wrote: >> > After examining the second patch >> > ("v2-0001-Add-restartpoint-stats.patch"), it appears that adding >> > additional statistics as outlined in the patch is the most suitable >> > approach to address the concerns raised. This solution provides more >> > visibility into the system's behavior without altering its core >> > mechanics. >> >> Agreed. I left only this variant of the patch and rework it due to commit 96f05261. >> So the new counters is in the pg_stat_checkpointer view now. >> Please see the v3-0001-add-restartpoints-stats.patch attached. >> >> >> > However, it's essential that this additional functionality >> > is accompanied by comprehensive documentation to ensure clear >> > understanding and ease of use by the PostgreSQL community. >> > >> > Please consider expanding the documentation to include detailed >> > explanations of the new statistics and their implications in various >> > scenarios. >> >> In the separate v3-0002-doc-for-restartpoints-stats.patch i added the definitions >> of the new counters into the "28.2.15. pg_stat_checkpointer" section >> and explanation of them with examples into the "30.5.WAL Configuration" one. >> >> Would be glad for any comments and and concerns. > > > I made some grammar corrections to the docs and have written the commit message. > > I think this patch now looks good. I'm going to push this if there are no objections. Per the docs, the sync_time, write_time and buffers_written only apply to checkpoints, not restartpoints. Is this correct? AFAICT from a quick look at the code they include both checkpoints and restartpoints in which case I think the docs should be clarified to indicate that? (Or if I'm wrong, and it doesn't include them, then shouldn't we have separate counters for them?) //Magnus
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: