Re: Upcoming back-branch releases
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Upcoming back-branch releases |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABUevExLT05Tggaj9KdROGNY=4HHv5avQKcVNUF+tkqVC3wouQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Upcoming back-branch releases (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Upcoming back-branch releases
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 2012-11-26 21:35:05 +0530, Pavan Deolasee wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> >> > We're about due for a new set of back-branch update releases. After >> > some discussion among the packagers, it seems the best window for >> > getting this done before the holiday season sets in is next week. >> > >> > Also, as previously mentioned, we're experimenting with weekday >> > rather than over-the-weekend release windows, since this is much >> > more convenient for Dave Page and his crew at EDB. >> > >> > The current plan is to wrap tarballs on Monday Dec 3 for public >> > announcement Thursday Dec 6. >> > >> > >> There is one open bug reported by Amit Kapila that I feel is important. I'd >> investigated this and Simon had volunteered to fix the same. >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-10/msg01584.php > > I have submitted a proposed fix for it friday: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20121124155005.GA10299%40awork2.anarazel.de > > For some reason the web ui only shows one of the the attachements > though... Did you by any chance use git-send-email to send it? That one is known to confuse how majordomo sticks it in the mbox files that are then later used to generate the archives... (Yes, a better way to deal with that is in the works. But it would certainly help to know if that's how the email was created, so we have more datapoints) --Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: