Re: Upcoming back-branch releases
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Upcoming back-branch releases |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20121126163218.GB6496@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Upcoming back-branch releases (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Upcoming back-branch releases
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2012-11-26 17:27:11 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > On 2012-11-26 21:35:05 +0530, Pavan Deolasee wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> > >> > We're about due for a new set of back-branch update releases. After > >> > some discussion among the packagers, it seems the best window for > >> > getting this done before the holiday season sets in is next week. > >> > > >> > Also, as previously mentioned, we're experimenting with weekday > >> > rather than over-the-weekend release windows, since this is much > >> > more convenient for Dave Page and his crew at EDB. > >> > > >> > The current plan is to wrap tarballs on Monday Dec 3 for public > >> > announcement Thursday Dec 6. > >> > > >> > > >> There is one open bug reported by Amit Kapila that I feel is important. I'd > >> investigated this and Simon had volunteered to fix the same. > >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-10/msg01584.php > > > > I have submitted a proposed fix for it friday: > > > > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20121124155005.GA10299%40awork2.anarazel.de > > > > For some reason the web ui only shows one of the the attachements > > though... > > Did you by any chance use git-send-email to send it? > > That one is known to confuse how majordomo sticks it in the mbox files > that are then later used to generate the archives... > > (Yes, a better way to deal with that is in the works. But it would > certainly help to know if that's how the email was created, so we have > more datapoints) No git-send-email in this case (although I used it in the past and likely will use it again). Mutt instead. The attachements were generated by "git format-patch HEAD~2" and then normally attached to the email. format-patch is internally used by send-email though, so that might be a hint... Greetings, Andres Freund --Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: