Re: [PATCH] PostgreSQL fails to build with 32bit MinGW-w64
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] PostgreSQL fails to build with 32bit MinGW-w64 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABUevEwqe0Fxu5c+PhKA+XQBZ3d-G=f+rq2j59D6DQ3EhNU5XQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] PostgreSQL fails to build with 32bit MinGW-w64 (NISHIYAMA Tomoaki <tomoakin@staff.kanazawa-u.ac.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] PostgreSQL fails to build with 32bit MinGW-w64
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 15:49, NISHIYAMA Tomoaki <tomoakin@staff.kanazawa-u.ac.jp> wrote: > Hi, > >> Have you verified if tihs affects _MSC_VER < 1400? Suddently that >> branch would care about HAVE_CRTDEFS_H, and I'm not sure if that's >> something we need to worry about. > > > I have no MSVC. In that sense it is not verified in fact, and I hope > those who knows well would kindly comment on it. > > However, it appears that pg_config.h is not created through > configure, but just copied from pg_config.h.win32 in those > compilers and thus HAVE_CRTDEFS_H will not be defined. > So, I think this code fragment will not be enabled in > _MSC_VER < 1400 Hmm, true. Unless HAVE_CRTDEFS_H is defined by the sytem, which it likely isn't - I was confusing it with the kind of defines that MSVC tends to stick in their own headerfiles, and thought that's what you were testing for. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: