Re: [PATCH] PostgreSQL fails to build with 32bit MinGW-w64
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] PostgreSQL fails to build with 32bit MinGW-w64 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4EDAACE6.1060207@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] PostgreSQL fails to build with 32bit MinGW-w64 (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] PostgreSQL fails to build with 32bit MinGW-w64
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/03/2011 09:59 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 15:49, NISHIYAMA Tomoaki > <tomoakin@staff.kanazawa-u.ac.jp> wrote: >> Hi, >> >>> Have you verified if tihs affects _MSC_VER< 1400? Suddently that >>> branch would care about HAVE_CRTDEFS_H, and I'm not sure if that's >>> something we need to worry about. >> >> I have no MSVC. In that sense it is not verified in fact, and I hope >> those who knows well would kindly comment on it. >> >> However, it appears that pg_config.h is not created through >> configure, but just copied from pg_config.h.win32 in those >> compilers and thus HAVE_CRTDEFS_H will not be defined. >> So, I think this code fragment will not be enabled in >> _MSC_VER< 1400 > Hmm, true. Unless HAVE_CRTDEFS_H is defined by the sytem, which it > likely isn't - I was confusing it with the kind of defines that MSVC > tends to stick in their own headerfiles, and thought that's what you > were testing for. > Yes, but there's a deal more work to do here. This whole thing is falling over in my build environment (64 bit Windows 7, MinGW/MSys, the machine that runs pitta on the buildfarm.) This is a long way from a done deal. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: