Re: Supporting Windows SChannel as OpenSSL replacement
| От | Magnus Hagander |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Supporting Windows SChannel as OpenSSL replacement |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CABUevEwk+AmnJfFQC_4mrdDJYNo1uEkTtdS0PZf_Yexq196j9w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Supporting Windows SChannel as OpenSSL replacement (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote:
On 06/09/2014 06:03 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:One tricky part is that programs like to use libpq for theIs there*anybody* other than odbc that does that? Do we actually need a>authentication, and then they hijack the connection using PGgetssl().
>
published API for that, or just a hack for pgodbc?
I wish psqlODBC would stop doing that. It's kind of cool that it supports compiling without libpq, but it's really quite a mess. I think we should modify psqlODBC to use the libpq API like most people do.
This was, I believe, done at one point, and then reverted. I think that was because libpq didn't actually have all the features required either for the current or for planned featues of the ODBC driver. That situation might be very different now though, there's more functionality available in libpq..
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: