Re: System username in pg_stat_activity
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: System username in pg_stat_activity |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABUevEw_7pSw38ya1RagWBs85H4n8MGH-k-FTstRGnayQyA4Kg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: System username in pg_stat_activity (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: System username in pg_stat_activity
Re: System username in pg_stat_activity |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 8:41 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > > Hi, > > On 2024-01-10 12:46:34 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > The attached patch adds a column "authuser" to pg_stat_activity which > > contains the username of the externally authenticated user, being the > > same value as the SYSTEM_USER keyword returns in a backend. > > I continue to think that it's a bad idea to make pg_stat_activity ever wider > with columns that do not actually describe properties that change across the > course of a session. Yes, there's the argument that that ship has sailed, but > I don't think that's a good reason to continue ever further down that road. > > It's not just a usability issue, it also makes it more expensive to query > pg_stat_activity. This is of course more pronounced with textual columns than > with integer ones. That's a fair point, but I do think that has in most ways already sailed, yes. I mean, we could split it into more than one view. But adding a new view for every new thing we want to show is also not very good from either a usability or performance perspective. So where would we put it? -- Magnus Hagander Me: https://www.hagander.net/ Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: