Re: Regarding useObjects
От | Vladimir Sitnikov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Regarding useObjects |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB=Je-G=X8UbhjB5HF8d9WS5eZdVUgqopvsocD5_0WpxOHcAyw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Regarding useObjects (Achilleas Mantzios <a.mantzios@cloud.gatewaynet.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Regarding useObjects
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
> so there was the option to change this to false and recompile We try doing our best to keep backward compatibility both compilation-wise and behaviour-wise. However, we treat "private fields and methods" as private, and we do not expect people would depend on them. If you have to modify sources or depend on private APIs I would suggest raising an issue or PR so it could be incorporated into the driver itself. Would you please provide a test case of what you are doing with PgArray? What is exactly the sequence of JDBC calls, the actual and the expected outcomes in your case? The mentioned "useObjects" has been removed in https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/1194 (Refactor decoding arrays) Vladimir
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: