Re: Regarding useObjects
От | Achilleas Mantzios - cloud |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Regarding useObjects |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8d8ea6c9-85a6-d1b8-309d-b1f5bc590840@cloud.gatewaynet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Regarding useObjects (Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Regarding useObjects
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Good Day Vladimir On 9/27/23 09:03, Vladimir Sitnikov wrote: >> so there was the option to change this to false and recompile > We try doing our best to keep backward compatibility both > compilation-wise and behaviour-wise. > However, we treat "private fields and methods" as private, and we do > not expect people would depend on them. > If you have to modify sources or depend on private APIs I would > suggest raising an issue or PR so it could be incorporated > into the driver itself. > > Would you please provide a test case of what you are doing with PgArray? > What is exactly the sequence of JDBC calls, the actual and the > expected outcomes in your case? E.g. for the case of floats, we have to change all: java.sql.Array arr = rs.getArray(1); Object objarr = arr.getArray(); float flarr[] = (float[]) objarr; to java.sql.Array arr = rs.getArray(1); Object objarr = arr.getArray(); Float flarr[] = (Float[]) objarr; > > The mentioned "useObjects" has been removed in > https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/1194 (Refactor decoding arrays) > > Vladimir
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: