Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Vladimir Sitnikov
Тема Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
Дата
Msg-id CAB=Je-Fjh3BF9O1PgxCgvqnXj=brLSqmNhNHoSk_6RPFJKjtPA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
Ответы Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
Список pgsql-jdbc
>I'm in favor of that. Even I, as a packager, almost fail all the times when I
see "9.4" there.

Glad to hear that.

I think he did not get we aim for 42.0.0.
42.0.0 is greater than 9.4.1212 if compared with maven and/or OSGi rules.

4.2.0 would indeed be a problem, so the suggestion is 42.0.0

Vladimir

В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dave Cramer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
Следующее
От: Dave Cramer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion