Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
| От | Vladimir Sitnikov |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAB=Je-ExO8MmbXoqf7k6evYAFTMZGvx39a4Z9aHwSjbiChi9+A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion (Jorge Solórzano <jorsol@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion |
| Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Naming things is hard.
pgjdbc 13.0 will probably interfere with PostgreSQL 13.0 in a near future.
Believe me or not, but we did have exactly the same discussion a year ago:
The suggestion was "42" as a major version to avoid clash with database version: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB%3DJe-HraoNEWyNFEUSxGjRpH-gC78jHXvDoxnH%2B0wBe%3Dc1rNg%40mail.gmail.com
Should we make it happen? )
Vladimir
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: