Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Vladimir Sitnikov
Тема Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
Дата
Msg-id CAB=Je-ExO8MmbXoqf7k6evYAFTMZGvx39a4Z9aHwSjbiChi9+A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion  (Jorge Solórzano <jorsol@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
Список pgsql-jdbc
Дерево обсуждения
Naming things is hard.
pgjdbc 13.0 will probably interfere with PostgreSQL 13.0 in a near future.

Believe me or not, but we did have exactly the same discussion a year ago:

The suggestion was "42" as a major version to avoid clash with database version: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB%3DJe-HraoNEWyNFEUSxGjRpH-gC78jHXvDoxnH%2B0wBe%3Dc1rNg%40mail.gmail.com 

Should we make it happen? )


Vladimir

В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jorge Solórzano
Дата:
Сообщение: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
Следующее
От: Jorge Solórzano
Дата:
Сообщение: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion