Re: [HACKERS] Is it time to kill support for very old servers?
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Is it time to kill support for very old servers? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqTypgNCAp7xfe-qb_==+xo_c46u+BiuxT2EaYH7CxTY4Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Is it time to kill support for very old servers? (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Is it time to kill support for very old servers?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 7:54 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: >>It seems to me that you are looking more for a connection parameter >>here. > > I'm not seeing a meaningful distinction here? Env vars and connection parameters are handled using the same framework inlibpq. And using the env var in the test would be better, because you'd only set one value - hard to do within our nonTAP tests (i.e. in an existing psql, started by pg regress) otherwise. Or both? I don't really understand why an environment variable is better than a connection string. For the TAP tests, you could just set the base of the connection string once and you are done as well. See the SSL tests for example. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: