Re: [HACKERS] Is it time to kill support for very old servers?
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Is it time to kill support for very old servers? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 473E2CDB-A8D8-4FCF-9788-84707DA5C1F2@anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Is it time to kill support for very old servers? (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Is it time to kill support for very old servers?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On September 18, 2017 4:08:21 AM PDT, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: >On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 7:54 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> >wrote: >>>It seems to me that you are looking more for a connection parameter >>>here. >> >> I'm not seeing a meaningful distinction here? Env vars and connection >parameters are handled using the same framework in libpq. And using >the env var in the test would be better, because you'd only set one >value - hard to do within our non TAP tests (i.e. in an existing psql, >started by pg regress) otherwise. > >Or both? I don't really understand why an environment variable is >better than a connection string. For the TAP tests, you could just set >the base of the connection string once and you are done as well. See >the SSL tests for example. Did you read what I wrote? -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: