Re: perlcritic
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: perlcritic |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqTmkjObHbihQy9ykSHzt=wmfShbw1zz_rUz-z5e4iO3rw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | perlcritic (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: perlcritic
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > We now have 80+ Perl files in our tree, and it's growing. Some of those > files were originally written for Perl 4, and the coding styles and > quality are quite, uh, divergent. So I figured it's time to clean up > that code a bit. I ran perlcritic over the tree and cleaned up all the > warnings at level 5 (the default, least severe). Do you think we should be concerned about the increased difficulty to backpatch fixes if this patch is applied? I personally think that's fine to do this cleanup on HEAD only, still others may have a different opinion. > Testing guidelines: > - msvc files need to be tested separately. I tested as best as I could > on a non-Windows system. And tested on Windows, I am not seeing failures. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: